Guy Oppenheim Green, Gold and Edible

 

 

 

 

Green, Gold and Edible

By Toby Birch and Guy Oppenheim

 

As 2010 draws to a close and pundits peddle insipid predictions for the year to come, it seems incredible how little has been learned over the last few years. There is huge relief among asset managers who have generated positive returns, albeit from a passive policy of investing and hoping for the best. Few seem to care about the cause or consequence of what made markets defy gravity. Their jobs are safe for now and with a bit of luck their bonuses will be locked-in. While share prices have undergone a roller-coaster ride and commentators have squandered every simile in relating it, certain things remain immovable. The first is the attitude of alpha male portfolio managers that don’t do apologies as well as they do arrogance. To admit an error of judgement, conflict of interest or plain bad luck is the ultimate corporate and financial faux pas. The second is the committee-driven and consensual structure of model portfolios that look just the same as they did 5 years ago.

 

The reason why many investment portfolios appear so similar is that they cling to core theories of managing money, such as the Efficient Market Hypothesis and the now-discredited Value-at-Risk measures. Like all hypotheses they are built with certain assumptions that academics accept but market players forget. They are not designed to accommodate human foibles, including those that led to leviathan levels of leverage. There is much controversy over their viability, as some believe them to be redundant post-2008. This navel-gazing is missing the point, as pending developments will sweep aside such intellectual niceties. This scholarly deliberation is reminiscent of Roman Senators who continued to debate trivia as the Barbarian hordes headed for the Metropolis. Few have modified their methodology and cling to the old mantras of money management. While distressing to discard what has been learned over one’s entire career, accepting reality is the essence of evolution where the smartest survive and will eventually prosper. These changes will be as painful as they are colossal but will, paradoxically, benefit future generations albeit at our expense.

 

With apologies to the literary fraternity that abhors the first person singular, allow us to make some observations in this article that go beyond the convenience of the next calendar year. As a result of such mental role-play, there are certain points in life where one’s sanity is questioned; either by oneself or by others. The last time this happened we wrote a book called The Final Crash to warn the public that a market meltdown was imminent. This time round it will be more than financial woes to worry about should our fears prove to be well founded. The penultimate chapter of the book is called “2020 vision”; a happy coincidence with the name of this publication. It highlighted the shift of power and wealth from West to East restoring the equilibrium that existed prior to the Industrial Revolution. Such extreme forecasts are fretful for the investment community that occupies a supposedly safe middle ground. Fear of change is the enemy of innovation and typical of dying industries that cling to dysfunctional habits through familiarity rather than observation of reality.

 

It is one thing to write text and tell people what to do; it is another to lead by example and provide a mechanism for change. To do so, Oppenheim & Co is designing a fund called Gaia Opportunities. After launch in 2011 it will only be open to professional investors. While the motivation is of course financial it nevertheless provides a practical platform for progress that is more powerful than mere words.

Given the dominance of High Frequency Trading one may question whether an investment fund is the right vehicle to effect reform in the real world. Just because markets are being artificially moulded does not mean they have mutated for good. They will undergo a transformation of ‘swords to ploughshares’ but for now are swelled by printed money and the erroneous assumption that the US Federal Reserve will prevent prices falling too far. While recognising that financial markets are prone to manipulation by central banks and institutions alike, we should not forget that the price mechanism is essential for drawing money to the right place in the most timely, efficient manner. The flow of capital is far more powerful than another round of stilted statute. With the best will in the world, projects don’t progress without finance so we must use market mechanisms that for once will benefit the real economy rather than the banking sector.

 

Before offering solutions we must first identify the signs and symptoms of what is to come. There is an old saying that history does not repeat but it does rhyme. The similarities with the 1930’s are becoming more disturbing by the day and leave one convinced that few of our leaders have any notion of historical precedent. Like the Seven Seals in the Book of Revelations key events are unfolding that appear pre-determined and obvious to those with understanding. They can be summarised as follows; money printing, currency debasement, capital controls, trade wars, protectionism, commodity price inflation and conflict at home and abroad. They need not follow in a neat consequential order and can easily run concurrently. Just as markets correlate closely during a crash, seemingly unrelated factors get sucked into the political and financial maelstrom. These include climate change, population growth and scarcity of resources. One-dimensional analysts and economists struggle to incorporate big-picture developments outside of the latest earnings figures or neutered inflation numbers. This is why so few could see the latest crash coming and cannot now comprehend what is going on under their noses.

 

While a fund cannot pretend to play a part in peaceful negotiations or prevent the accumulation of greenhouse gases, it can at least help to cope with some of the consequences. It may also offer a partial hedge against the ‘Seven Seal’ risks highlighted above. Many investment products are sold on the back of fear and greed or ethics and obligation but the fulfilment factor is often overlooked. The benefit stems from the symbiosis that rewards investors and the companies associated with combatting climate change. It means that making money and making a difference need not be mutually exclusive. More importantly it could leave a legacy for the next generation, short-changed with the prospect of higher taxes, mega-mortgages and permanent pollution. The growth of the green sector and alternative energy will flourish as the oil price spirals with dollar debasement; like the aftermath of a flash flood in what was seemingly a barren desert. The Gaia Opportunities Fund will focus on green investments and companies that provide solutions for climate change and key megatrends to come. It will also include real, earth-related assets such as precious metals and commodities – especially those related to agriculture, fertilisers and the food chain – hence the title of ‘Green, Gold and Edible’.

 

 

1 comment

  1. Mark September 17, 2012 10:40 am  Reply

    Wonderful Mr. Guy Oppenheim. I like this lesson.